top of page

Conventional Storage Options 

Energy storage has the potential to contribute to the operation of power systems in a number of ways. The most important are:   

​

    Managing intermittency caused by the integration of time variable renewable sources of generation,      and thereby facilitating improved decarbonisation of the electricity supply system.   

    Providing solutions in grid constrained areas.   

    Supporting energy security.   

    Operational cost savings and financial/commercial opportunities. 

  

Short Term Cycle Uses (seconds to minutes)   

​

Short term uses of energy storage are mostly associated with maintaining the stability of the power system, e.g emergency reserve to cover loss of plant or transmission lines. Such an application requires large power ratings, but only for seconds or minutes. Conventionally this is supplied by spinning reserve (i.e. part loaded plant), pumped storage, or open cycle gas turbines. Other storage technologies like flywheels could be an alternative. A key economic issue is that use of this supply is only occasional – at most a few times per year. Other uses include power system frequency regulation or voltage control and also providing angle stability (which relates to the electromechanical connection between the electrical generator and the grid that must be maintained if generation is not to be interrupted).  

  

Intermediate Cycle Uses (hours to days)   

​

Energy storage in electricity systems is most commonly aimed at intermediate time scales. These, most often larger scale systems, are usually for high energy use and thus on the scale of MWh of storage. There are a few key applications.   

Load shifting, load levelling or peak shaving are all part of a subset of load management activities that can be delivered by storage. This use focuses on moving or shifting pieces of the load often to reduce the peak load. Commonly, peak shaving involves storing surplus energy from renewables and discharging the storage during a time of high demand. Load levelling, on the other hand, which may also reduce the peak, usually involves charging the storage from the grid during times of low demand and then discharging during a peak. The other key usage for storage of intermediate cycle length is the ability to store energy generated from renewable sources, usually when more electricity is generated than can be absorbed by the power system at a given time. The energy generated through renewable sources is much less responsive to supply and demand, and thus flexible conventional generation is required, or perhaps energy storage, to ensure a secure supply.   

 

After conducting a thorough literature review on energy storage technologies and associated matrices for storage solutions we narrowed down the current market options to li-ion and REDOX flow batteries as being the most favorable. This fell in line with what Scottish Water have been looking to deploy recently on their asset sites. They also represent, currently the most convenient/accessible solutions available on the market from an operational perspective.    

 

A good overview for energy storage options in Scotland is the Infield, D., Hill, J., 2014. Literature Review: Electrical Energy Storage for Scotland.  

  

We decided to create our own energy storage matrix around the cases study WWTW site we had data for regarding Li-ion and a REDOX flow Battery solutions. We received information regarding a proposed solution that SW were looking to implement including technical specifications and capital cost’s. 

Conventional
WhatsApp Image 2021-05-13 at 11.57.06.jp

Cost analysis

​

The proposed Tesla PowerWall solution for this specific site has a capability of 121.5 kWh total of usable energy for the whole unit solution.  The total cost is around £70,000 for the solution implementation. CAPEX power equals £538/kWh for the Tesla power wall . It’s currently the most convenient solution however not the most Sustainable. The energy storage market is currently dominated by Lithium ion battery’s due to an increase in Electric vehicles this is impart Eencouraged by government policy. The re-use of batteries feeds into Circular economy principles however the use of rare earth elements within the batteries is a cause for concern as we are predicted to run out of some of these elements potentially within the next 15 to 40 years at the current extraction rate.

A Redox flow battery solution could cost anywhere between £434 to £1128 (using XE currency converter) for Capex power per kWh. Taking the average for the Redox flow battery solution (Capex power £781 per kWh) would mean the likely cost of a solution that would give you the same CAPEX power as the Tesla powerwall would potentially cost around £94,891.5. Any proposed Redox battery solution would require more space to house the system compared to the Tesla powerwall. However, the redox flow battery has a far greater life cycle along with using less/no rare earth elements compared to Li-ion batteries. It can be assumed that a Redox Flow battery could be a greener energy storage solution than the proposed Tesla Powerwall that Scottish Water Horizons have selected.

Conclusion

​

Concluding remarks on conventional energy storage solutions reviewed

Going forward, redox flow batteries may be a more economically viable option due to the maturing of the technology. It could be more cost effective currently if the lowest cost solution for the Redox flow battery quoted in literature and subsequently this Matrix can be sourced by a relevant partner. The biggest factor influencing potential future costs is the price of vanadium for Redox flow batteries. Also, the convenience of using tried and tested Li-ion battery manufacturers like Tesla allows for easier project development. Essentially the decision comes down to convenience and the size requirement of the constructed energy storage unit along with sustainability (of which the Redox flow battery is a far better option). 

bottom of page